Na's profileToday is a presentPhotosBlogListsMore Tools Help
    15 January

    情迷 色 戒

    14日,色 戒终于在cardiff 粉墨登场。

    早就熟读了张爱琳的这部不算完美的小说,源于对李安的期待,想象 brokeback mountain 那样完美的画面,以及早在媒体上炒作的沸沸扬扬的性爱场面,决心一定要在首映那天跑去电影院大快朵颐。谁想首映那天还没从埃及回转,只好一直忍到10号那天才终于有幸达成夙愿。

    故事情节对我来说毫无悬念,可是2个半小时,却还是让我凝神屏气,一直到走出电影院才舒口气。电影美丽得让人晕眩,却黑色的让人窒息。室外刺骨的寒风才让我稍微平静下来。想要说一些自己的感慨,却几乎不记得电影里说了什么,只有黄昏或黑暗的城市,在沦陷的上海飞驰的汽车,麻将桌上昏暗的灯光和光怪陆离的阔太太们和钻戒,易先生孤独又绝望的眼神,以及王佳之苍白但优雅的下巴和美丽的胸部,在脑海中回旋。我想我是爱上了她,或者说是沉迷了,不能自拔。决定再看一次。。。

     

    对李安描述绝望的爱情悲剧,讲述人如何深陷于对爱情的沉迷和道德选择的痛苦之中,悄无声息地剥露人性中的阴郁和黑暗,以及对历史细节的把握,都让我为之倾倒和沉醉。听说 引发大陆民族主义者的口水示威狂潮,数千万个恶骂帖子堆积在互联网上,形成庞大的暴力话语泡沫。我只能对他们说,艺术的最大魅力和最高境界在于,她没有时间,空间和人种的局限,她是一种对人性的贯穿和通达,全人类在她面前,就如站在上帝面前的孩子一样,赤裸着身体,却温暖的如同回家。 

     

    整部戏,李安无疑是最大的赢家。本片的最大失败者无疑是广电总局。它以父亲般的粗暴方式,腰斩了《色戒》的床戏镜头。一方面拒绝对电影实施暴力和情色分级,一方面却要捍卫国家主义叙事的纯洁性,这种可笑的管理模式加剧了电影市场的混乱。中国民众不是幼儿园孩童,广电总局用红布蒙上他们的眼睛,只能引出适得其反的后果:它不仅激怒了观众,而且激发普遍的猎奇心理,由此煽起香港旅游的狂潮 (或许也不算太坏)。

    在这里不得不引用一位我很喜欢的影评人的文章。我想他清楚地表达了我想要说的话。

      

     

     

     

    Trapped in rapture

    By Nigel Andrews and Karl French

    Published: January 2 2008 17:52 | Last updated: January 2 2008 17:52

    Ang Lee’s Lust, Caution is quietly mesmerising. With its dark, sleek, fugitive grace, it is like watching life reflected in the bodywork of a polished Rolls-Royce. Everyone is on the move in this tale of conspiracy in Japanese-occupied China, where a pretty girl (Tang Wei), working for a radical group of students-turned-actors, sets out to seduce and prime for assassination a VIP collaborator (Tony Leung). At the same time, Lee’s second Venice Golden Lion winner in three years (the first was Brokeback Mountain) is a glacial film noir, an icy slab of history (1937-42) that freezes people in consecutive poses – courage, imposture, desire, despair – as if still awaiting the animating purr of the projector.

    Just like Brokeback Mountain, another tale of doomed romance drawn from a woman author (here it is China’s Eileen Chang), Lust, Caution is about people caught in a vice between the ecstasy of love and the agony of moral choice. Lee has a wonderful new actress in Tang Wei. Her demure prettiness a little louche about the mouth and jawline, she is a doll who can also be a slut. This spy-conspirator falls helplessly into the trap of the sadomasochistic raptures her victim/lover lavishes on her in extended scenes of eye-popping, graphic sex.

    Largely shot in a studio, the film is a hothouse fantasy of 70-years-ago Hong Kong and Shanghai, as airless as Brokeback Mountain was open-range. But claustrophobia is the point: everyone is trapped, the plotters and plotted-against. Sex is narcotic chamber music, for two players and no audience (except us). Murder must be noiseless, furtive and brutal, as in the gang’s improvised killing of a potential whistle-blower (very Torn Curtain). When the group takes a rare trip to a deserted beach for shooting practice, the light and sea air go to what is left of their brains – “We’ve got the guns, why don’t we shoot a couple of easy targets before school starts?” – and the film hints at the anarchy lapping at these ideologues’ lives.

    In the city it is always dusk or darkness, as swish cars swish from the colonial drives or street trams carry their freight of anonymity-hugging schemers. Lee has an extraordinary talent for qui vive watchfulness in close-ups. The film’s impassive faces will always, at some point, open a trapdoor into self-revelation. The darker the film gets, the more poignant these points of light or epiphany.

    It’s a classic plot: love versus political loyalty. Imagine Aida and Notorious thrown together in a shaker, the final cocktail blending period exoticism with tenebrous tension and mordant nihilism. The ending is bleak indeed: those who live by mendacity will die by it. Only in a world where cruelty is for consenting sensual play between adults, not coercive historical destiny, can love and freedom exist for those who want both, with or without a twist of the perverse.

    Comments (6)

    Please wait...
    Sorry, the comment you entered is too long. Please shorten it.
    You didn't enter anything. Please try again.
    Sorry, we can't add your comment right now. Please try again later.
    To add a comment, you need permission from your parent. Ask for permission
    Your parent has turned off comments.
    Sorry, we can't delete your comment right now. Please try again later.
    You've exceeded the maximum number of comments that can be left in one day. Please try again in 24 hours.
    Your account has had the ability to leave comments disabled because our systems indicate that you may be spamming other users. If you believe that your account has been disabled in error please contact Windows Live support.
    Complete the security check below to finish leaving your comment.
    The characters you type in the security check must match the characters in the picture or audio.

    To add a comment, sign in with your Windows Live ID (if you use Hotmail, Messenger, or Xbox LIVE, you have a Windows Live ID). Sign in


    Don't have a Windows Live ID? Sign up

    chen chenwrote:
    不是因为你色,那个电影确实不错,反映了现在社会的一些弊病,估计这才是国内被封杀的真正原因吧
    22 Jan.
    Na Liwrote:
    苹果,看了阿,我觉得还不错。只是结尾有点逊色,其实可以拍得更好的。。。我喜欢这种电影,不是因为我色吧?
    20 Jan.
    chen chenwrote:
    那天去电影院看电影,突然蹦出来一部色戒,很黄很暴力,我立刻就买票了。
    19 Jan.
    我还没看呢。。很多人说不好看,也有人说不知道拍了些什么,有人只是想一睹影帝的身材。。你对看艺术片好有感概哦。听说“苹果”也被封杀了,太色情。你有看吗?
    18 Jan.
    辰 雨wrote:
    呵呵,好象太严肃了,好久没写这么多了,其实本意就是觉得评论过于政治化,想推荐一篇关于电影本身的,,,证明我很罗嗦,,,
    15 Jan.
    辰 雨wrote:
    所有的这一切,包括times上的评论(个人及其不满意),什么大陆剪辑,什么汉奸历史的误读,引出的正反方的意见,都将张爱玲的本意,李安的焦点给扭曲,模糊了。明明就是一个爱情故事,一个明媚女子的爱情在大时代下被阴暗的人性给蹂碎。其他的乱七八糟的都是没看懂故事在那里瞎闹腾,包括那些民族主义者,和,外国几个所谓的主流电影评论媒体。还是法国人比较有悟性,没有青睐那个有点装腔做调的‘赎罪’(这里就显出了美国人的英国文化情节)。或者因为主席是老谋子?乱八卦一下:)
    推荐一篇,韩松落的'红粉与黑水潭' ,http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_44b0d9f501000awp.html,看到最合心意的。个人觉得,这个故事还真不能抛开张爱玲来解读。所以,所有的外文评论在我看来太表面化了,或者说是纯艺术性了,没有搔到痒处。或者这就是在英美的票房很一般的原因,倒也是李安意料之中的。终于有个大导演不是打算拍给外国人,而是华人才能懂的片子。
    15 Jan.

    Trackbacks

    The trackback URL for this entry is:
    http://spidergirlina.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!AE2C2746206A3704!1297.trak
    Weblogs that reference this entry
    • None